Popular Articles
Cellulite Cream

UT Gets Federal Stimulus Grant For Parkinson's Disease Research
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston has received a $412,500 federal stimulus grant for Parkinson"s disease research, the university announced today. It is the university"s first federal stimulus grant.
generic viagra online
It's Not Just The Sun: DeCODE Discovers Sequence Variants Affecting Susceptibility To Skin Cancer
Scientists at deCODE genetics (Nasdaq: DCGN) and academic colleagues from Europe and the United States today present in the journal Nature Genetics the discovery of common genetic risk factors for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) that affect people with fair and dark complexions alike. deCODE had previously discovered five common single-letter variants in the sequence of the human genome (SNPs) linked to risk of BCC, the most common cancer in people of European descent. However, most of these earlier findings were also correlated with fair skin, well known to accompany vulnerability to the damaging effects of ultraviolet radiation in sunlight.
News of the day
GOP Senators Signal They Will Not Block Sotomayor; Full Senate Vote Expected By Aug. 7
Senate Republicans on Thursday said that they do not plan to block a vote on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, the Washington Post reports. Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) told Sotomayor that he would not support any effort to filibuster her nomination, meaning that she would need a simple majority of 50 votes to be confirmed. Because Democrats hold 60 votes in the Senate, Sessions" comments effectively end "any possible suspense over her fate," according to the Post (Kane et al., Washington Post, 7/17). Sessions said, "I will not support and I don"t think any member of this side will support a filibuster or any attempt to block a vote on your nomination," adding, "I look forward to you getting that vote before we recess in August." According to CQ Politics, Sessions" statement that Republicans will not filibuster "is bound to rile conservative activists," who have urged GOP senators to delay the vote to allow more time to build opposition.Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also signaled that he would vote for Sotomayor"s confirmation (Perine, CQ Politics, 7/16). He said, "We"ll see what your future holds, but I think it"s going to be pretty bright" (Bendavid, "Washington Wire," Wall Street Journal, 7/16). Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) said that although he will not support Sotomayor"s confirmation, he will not filibuster the vote (Rushing, The Hill, 7/16). Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) told Sotomayor, "Thank you for giving us such a cordial response, and I am mightily impressed" (Washington Post, 7/17).Voting Timeline UnclearSenate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said he would schedule a committee vote on the nomination for July 21. It remains unclear whether committee Republicans will delay the vote until July 28, as they are permitted to do under committee rules. Sessions called the July 21 vote "unrealistic," adding that there "will be a number of questions submitted to the nominee that take some time" (CQ Politics, 7/16). A party-line vote on the nomination does not seem likely, as a number of committee Republicans have praised Sotomayor and signaled that they will vote to confirm her, the AP/Boston Globe reports (Holland, AP/Boston Globe, 7/17). The committee"s vote serves as a recommendation to the full Senate, which likely will hold its final roll-call vote on the nomination by Aug. 7 (Washington Post, 7/17). Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Thursday said he wants a floor vote on Sotomayor "as quickly as possible" (Brady, Roll Call, 7/16).During the hearing on Thursday, Sotomayor reiterated that she would consider each case individually and declined to state her specific views on abortion rights. In response to Coburn, she said, "Would you want a ... nominee who came in here and said, "I agree with you. This is unconstitutional," before I had a case before me?" She added, "I don"t know that that"s a justice that I can be" (Kiely/Biskupic, USA Today, 7/17). According to the New York Times, "Some observers thought they detected her tipping her hand on abortion rights when she said Supreme Court precedents required abortion restrictions to make exceptions for a woman"s health" (Savage, New York Times, 7/17).
Public Health

'Invading' Bacteria In DNA

Call it advanced warfare on the most elemental of levels. Researchers at Texas A&M University"s Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering have discovered how certain types of bacteria integrate the DNA that they have captured from invading enemies into their own genetic makeup to increase their chances of survival. To be more accurate, the genetic material isn"t really captured as much as it is simply utilized after it"s injected into the bacteria by an invading virus, says Professor Thomas K. Wood, who along with colleagues Xiaoxue Wang and Younghoon Kim has published the findings in Nature"s 2009 International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal. Wood"s findings shed light on a millions-of-years-old battle between bacteria and bacteria-eating viruses known as "phages." Locked in an epic struggle, the two life forms, Woods explains, are constantly developing new ways to win the war. One such approach undertaken by a phage is to attach to a bacterial cell and, using a syringe-like tail apparatus, inject its genetic material into the bacterial cell. Once inside, the phage replicates itself and eventually exits the cell to find new bacteria to infect. But as is the case with men, the best-laid plans of phages can also go astray. Examining E. coli bacteria, Wood found that the bacteria developed a means of not allowing the phage to replicate and leave the cell of its own volition. Once the phage was effectively "captured," the bacteria incorporated the phage"s DNA material into its own chromosomes. This new diverse blend of genetic material, Wood says, has helped the bacteria not only overcome the phage but also flourish at a greater rate than similar bacteria that have not incorporated the phage DNA. "The bacteria are alive and doing well, and in fact the bacteria are doing better because it captured its enemy," Wood said. "Our research shows that if these bacteria didn"t have this particular set of 25 genes that belonged to the old phage it wouldn"t be able to grow as fast. If you removed the phage remnant, the bacteria grows five times slower on some carbon s." This distinct advantage is helping scientists understand why bacteria carry about 10-20 percent of genes that aren"t their own. Simply put, carrying the virus DNA allows bacteria to increase their chances of survival by producing diverse progeny - something Wood says is extremely important when the bacteria choose to move to a new environment through a process known as dispersal. Dispersal occurs, Woods says, when the bacterium can no longer glean the nutrients it needs from its surroundings or when other environmental conditions, such as temperature, have become unfavorable. Wood found that through an elaborate regulation method, the bacteria are able to retain the virus DNA or expel it. It"s an interesting trade off, as retaining the virus DNA helps the bacteria grow faster but reduces its motility, which is needed when seeking out new environments, Wood explains. Further exploring this dynamic, Wood and his research group were able to link this regulation process to the formation of bacterial communities called biofilms. A biofilm, Wood says, is a protective, adhesive slime created by bacteria that have joined together to form a community and reap the benefits of a "strength-in-numbers" approach. Biofilms can grow on a variety of living and nonliving surfaces, including submerged rocks, food, teeth (as plaque) and biomedical implants such as knee and hip replacements. The National Institutes of Health estimate that about 90 percent of infections in humans are caused by biofilms, and the Centers for Disease Control estimate biofilm to be present in 65 percent of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections. Biofilms typically are the cause of fatal infections that develop post surgery. More commonly, they are the of persistent ear infections among children. In addition to finding that biofilm formation relies heavily on virus genes present within the bacteria, Wood"s research has shown the mechanism for how this takes place. A protein within the bacterium called Hha has the ability to control whether virus genes are kept within the bacterium or jettisoned. When Hha is basically "turned on," the bacteria expel the virus genes, opting for motility over the ability to form biofilms. Likewise, when Hha is not expressed, the bacteria move slower but grow biofilms at a much faster rate, Wood explains. It"s a finding that could impact everything from health care to research into alternative fuel production. "If we can understand how biofilms are formed, we can begin to manipulate forming them where we want and getting them to not form where we don"t want them," Wood says. "We have found a regulator - this Hha - that controls the genes related to biofilm formation. Now we can begin to envision ways to turn on that Hha gene if we want to get rid of biofilms, and that is what we are working on. That"s the long-term goal - as engineers to make biofilms where we want them. "For example, if we want to remediate soil, we"d form a biofilm on the roots of plants, plant the tree, and wherever the tree root goes we clean the soil. That"s a beneficial biofilm. If I want to make hydrogen with E. coli, I"ll probably want to do it in a biofilm, so I would want to promote the growth of the biofilm. "We"re one of the first labs in the world that has begun to not only try to understand how biofilms form but to control them." Thomas Wood Texas A&M University


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):